Category: 1970s Cold Cases

  • MURDER MYSTERY: Why didn’t anyone hear the shots that killed John Leonard? And why it matters.

    MURDER MYSTERY: Why didn’t anyone hear the shots that killed John Leonard? And why it matters.

    Updated: June 25, 2025, added more information about the use of silencers

    Lots of things don’t add up in the John Leonard murder case.

    Here’s one of them:

    How did no one hear the five gunshots that killed John Leonard?

    At first glance, you might assume the killer used a silencer.
    But look closer at the facts and the type of weapon involved, and that theory doesn’t hold up so well.

    More on that below.


    John Leonard, cold case murder victim
    John Leonard

    Background Information

    John Leonard, 52, was a father of five who worked for Mick’s Motors and Taxi Service in the Poconos. He and his children lived in an apartment on the business’s property. John was a decorated World War II veteran, a former POW of a Nazi war camp, and a devout Catholic.

    The last fare

    On September 8th, 1970, John Leonard went out to pick up a taxi fare. It was the Tuesday after Labor Day — a beautiful late-summer day, with temperatures in the mid to upper 70s, and only a few clouds in the sky.1 According to taxi company owner Don Mick, a caller requested pickup at the entrance to the Inn at Buck Hill Falls. The Inn was 2 miles from Mick’s Motors; a mere five-minute drive.

    The Inn, a massive 400-room luxury resort on a hill, loomed over Buck Hill Falls, one of five villages in Barrett Township. In 1970, the township population was just 2,452, per census records. Not exactly New York City. It was quiet and woodsy, as you can see on the map below.

    Map showing the last known location of John Leonard  and the Inn where his body was discovered in 1970.

    Body discovery in the John Leonard murder case

    News reports state taxi company owner Don Mick discovered John’s bullet-riddled body in his cab. John was parked on the long driveway leading up to the Inn. Don said he went to look for John after John stopped responding to radio calls.

    John Leonard was shot five times, bullets striking his head, neck and back. Detective Craig Vanlouvender, Chief Detective of Cold Cases for the Monroe County D.A., told Dateline NBC that John was killed with a .22-caliber weapon, most likely a revolver due to the lack of shell casings at the scene. Investigators believe the killer shot him through the open driver’s side window.

    The prevailing theory in the John Leonard murder case is that John was murdered right there — on the Inn’s driveway — by the person who called for the taxi.

    So that would mean he was shot outdoors, in the middle of a beautiful day, 50 yards (150 feet) from the entrance of a 400-room inn and resort.

    Yet, nobody heard the shots. Not any of the guests, not any of the staff, not any passersby. What are the odds?


    Ballistics and Acoustics Breakdown

    According to multiple sources on firearms acoustics, a .22-caliber revolver, though not the loudest gun, produces a report of 135 to 140 decibels at the muzzle.

    At 50 yards away, that sound would still register at around 90 to 100 decibels — comparable to standing next to a leaf blower or motorcycle. Plus, a sharp, cracking sound like gunfire is easy to distinguish, especially in a quiet rural setting.

    Could the environment have muffled the sound?

    The drive up to the inn, where John was found in his taxi, was lined with hemlock trees and rhododendron bushes. Dense vegetation can muffle or scatter sound. But for five gunshots in a row to go completely unnoticed in broad daylight? While possible, it would require very unusual acoustic conditions.

    What about people inside the Inn?

    Most buildings, even older ones, don’t block gunfire entirely, especially at short distances. Guests or staff might have heard something, even if they didn’t recognize it as gunshots at first — a .22 can sound like a firecracker or a nail gun.


    Why did no one hear the shots?

    A few theories:

    The killer used a sound suppressor (silencer). If the murder weapon is a .22 revolver as the police believe, a “silencer” wouldn’t do much to reduce the noise from the shots. I’m no firearms expert, so I did some research and found this:

    A suppressor (silencer) is largely ineffective on a .22 revolver — or any revolver — because of the design of the gun.

    Most revolvers, including .22s, have a gap between the cylinder and the barrel called the cylinder-barrel gap. When a round is fired, hot gases and sound escape through that gap, bypassing the suppressor entirely. This makes suppressors nearly useless on traditional revolvers for significantly reducing noise.

    A few rare, specialized revolvers, like the Russian Nagant M1895, are designed to seal that gap and can be suppressed — but they’re not commonly used in the U.S., especially not in the 1960s or 70s.

    So if someone fired a .22 revolver in a crime, even with a suppressor, it would still be quite audible, especially outdoors in a quiet area. 

    Environmental conditions muffled the sound. Another explanation for why no one heard the shots is the shooting happened at just the right moment, at the right place, and under the right conditions for no one to hear a thing. Ground temperature, wind direction, humidity and more can affect how far sound travels. I’d love to hear the what a ballistics expert would have to say about this.

    Witnesses stayed silent. Then again, it could be that witnesses heard the shots, but decided to keep their mouths shut about it.

    Police buried the report. Another possibility, in the realm of conspiracy, is people heard the shots and reported it, but the police ‘lost’ that information. (It was the ’70s.)

    The body was moved. It’s also possible, since no one at the inn said they witnessed the shooting or even heard the shots, that John Leonard was killed elsewhere and his body was moved.

    Why does it matter?

    If a witness did hear the shots, it would’ve helped pin down a solid timeline. As it stands, the timeline of the John Leonard murder case has glaring inconsistencies. [That’s for another post.]

    If John Leonard wasn’t killed at the Inn, then the crime scene everyone has accepted for half a century isn’t the real one.

    And if that’s the case, the entire timeline of the crime collapses. Evidence could’ve been left behind elsewhere. Witnesses could’ve seen things in different locations.

    The family’s investigation

    Based on leads from their own independent investigation, the Leonard family believes that John Leonard was likely not murdered at Buck Hill Falls, but killed somewhere else and brought there.

    If the family is right, and the murder didn’t happen at the Inn at Buck Hill Falls, then what else have we misunderstood about this murder case that’s been unsolved for more than 50 years?

    Explore more 1970s cold cases here

    Key facts – John Leonard murder case

    The Victim

    • John Leonard, 52 years old
    • Father of five children
    • Decorated World War II veteran
    • Former POW in a Nazi war camp
    • Devout Catholic
    • Worked for Mick’s Motors and Taxi Service
    • Lived with his children in an apartment on the business property

    Crime Details

    • Date: September 8, 1970 (Tuesday after Labor Day)
    • Weather: Warm and partly sunny, highs in upper 70s
    • Shot five times (head, neck, and back)
    • Weapon: 22-caliber, likely a revolver
    • No shell casings found at the scene
    • Possibly shot through open driver’s side window
    • No witnesses reported hearing gunshots

    Location

    • Body found in taxi on driveway to Inn at Buck Hill Falls
    • Inn was a 400-room luxury resort
    • Located in Buck Hill Falls village, Barrett Township
    • Township population in 1970: 2,452
    • Only 2 miles (5-minute drive) from Mick’s Motors

    Discovery

    • Body discovered by Don Mick, taxi company owner
    • Mick said he went looking after John stopped responding to radio calls
    • Found John’s bullet-riddled body in his cab

    Prevailing Theory

    • John was responding to a pickup request
    • Fare requested pickup at entrance to Inn at Buck Hill Falls
    • Killer likely the person who called for the taxi
    • Shot to death in the driveway of the Inn

    Key Mystery

    • How did nobody hear five gunshots?
    • No shell casings found
    • No witnesses despite daytime murder
    • Murder occurred near a populated luxury resort
  • MURDER MYSTERY: Why was the suspect sketch never released?

    MURDER MYSTERY: Why was the suspect sketch never released?

    The John Leonard cold case has a lot of unanswered questions. The situation with the sketch is a real head-scratcher IMO. Do you have any theories about why it went down the way it did? Please share with us in the comments.

    Imagine if you were a child when your father is shot to death in broad daylight while sitting in his taxi. The killer takes off before anyone finds the scene. The crime seems completely random, making it just about impossible to solve. Even though it’s huge news in your tiny town, the case grows cold fast. Then settles into a decades-long deep freeze. No leads. No justice.

    Fifty years pass. Now you’re at a place in life where you start to look back. You begin digging into the case yourself. You push law enforcement for answers. Bit by bit, some clues emerge.

    And then, one detail stops you cold.

    The police had a sketch of the main suspect. Two witnesses saw a man standing next to your father’s car around the time of the murder. They helped an artist create an image of that man. But that sketch was never released! Not to the public. Not even to your family.

    Why?

    Could you really be blamed for wondering whether police ever truly meant to solve this case? Was someone being protected — at the expense of your father’s life, and your family’s right to the truth and justice?

    After all, this unsolved murder didn’t just happen anywhere.

    It happened in the Poconos, where, in the 1970s, you couldn’t turn left or right without bumping into gangsters. And that’s not hyperbole. Those were the exact words of Joan Weiner, then-head of the Pennsylvania Crime Commission. She reported “‘a significant infiltration of organized crime figures‘ at all levels of the resort business in the Pocono Mountains of northeastern Pennsylvania.”

    The Inn at Buck Hill Falls postcard

    John Leonard — the father in this case — was murdered just 50 yards from the grand stone entrance of the Inn at Buck Hill Falls, a 400-room luxury resort that once drew guests from across the country, particularly from Philadelphia, New Jersey, and New York.

    Today, the sketch is finally public — more than five decades after the murder. You can see it here and in the embedded video below.

    But the case is still unsolved.

    Who was the man standing by John Leonard’s car?
    Was he the killer?
    Why was the sketch kept from the family for so long?
    And what else has been buried?

    These are some of the questions we’ll be exploring in an upcoming episode of the new NEPA True Crime podcast. Even after fifty years, someone still knows something, and it’s not too late to speak up.

    Sketch released in decades-old Monroe County cold case

    Read more about the Leonard family’s fight for justice.

    💚 Donate to and share the GoFundMe: Exhumation & Solving Two Murders in One

     

  • 💔 Help Solve Two Cold Cases: Leonard Family Seeks Justice Through Exhumation Fundraiser

    💔 Help Solve Two Cold Cases: Leonard Family Seeks Justice Through Exhumation Fundraiser

    Monroe County, Pennsylvania

    black and white photo of the Leonard family. A man and woman and five small children.
    The Leonard family

    For more than five decades, twin sisters Lori and Debbie Leonard have lived with unanswered questions no family should have to carry. Why were their parents, John and Madeleine Leonard, murdered? And why are their cases still unsolved more than 50 years later?

    The Leonard family launched a GoFundMe campaign with the goal of exhuming their parents’ remains to finally get answers through modern forensic testing. They hope it will finally provide the answers denied to them by decades of stalled investigations, lost records, and what they allege is a systemic cover-up.

    “Our parents were both murdered in the 1970s,” Lori Leonard writes. “We need to have their bodies exhumed and examined by modern forensics to find truth and answers. We need justice and closure.”

    A Cab Ride That Ended in Murder

    On September 8, 1970, John Leonard Sr., a WWII veteran and taxi driver for Mick’s Taxi Service, was dispatched to Buck Hill Falls Inn for a seemingly routine fare. He never came back home.

    He was found in his cab, shot multiple times in the head, neck, and back. His murder, committed just 150 feet from the Inn’s front doors, in broad daylight, was never solved.

    Despite witnesses seeing a man near the cab and irregularities in the investigation timeline, police closed ranks. The owner of the taxi company towed the car himself — then drove it again for business six weeks later. Autopsy records vanished. Leads were dismissed.

    Two Years Later, Another Sudden, Tragic Death

    On February 21, 1973, Madeleine Leonard, a waitress at the Top Hat Restaurant in Mountainhome, told her daughters she was going out to pursue a lead on her husband’s murder. She never came home again.

    The next morning, her body was found in a wrecked car. Local police at the time noted tire tracks from another vehicle, paint transfer, and rear-end damage, all suggesting she may have been run off the road. But Pennsylvania State Police declined to investigate it as a homicide.

    According to the Leonards, they only discovered in 2017 that their mother’s death had not ever been treated as a potential crime.

    Why Exhumation Matters

    After repeated roadblocks from law enforcement, the Leonard sisters are seeking $75,000 to:

    • Exhume both parents’ remains
    • Hire a modern forensic pathologist to perform full autopsies
    • Conduct DNA testing
    • Retain a private investigator and legal counsel

    They say the Monroe County Coroner, Thomas Yanac, told them records of any autopsies are missing and confirmed that Madeleine’s death certificate was “not consistent” with her crash being accidental.

    Related: Leonard Family Calls for United Victims’ Voices

    A Veteran, Parents, Silenced Victims

    Both John and Madeleine Leonard were respected community members. Also, John was a decorated POW from World War II. Madeleine was a Gold Star Mother, having lost a son in Vietnam.

    Their surviving daughters — now in their 60s — are the only ones of the five Leonard children left to seek justice.

    “Our family has suffered for over 52 years. Our parents gave so much to this country and their community. They deserve honor and justice.”

    You can find a detailed account of their story on the official GoFundMe page.

    How You Can Help

    💚 Donate or share the official GoFundMe:  Exhumation & Solving Two Unsolved Murders in One

    Know something? Call PA CrimeStoppers: 1-800-4PA-TIPS

    Share this post on social media to amplify their story.

    More coverage:


    NEPA True Crime will continue to follow this case and support efforts to seek answers. An in-depth podcast episode on the John and Madeleine Leonard cases is currently in production.

  • Leonard Family Calls for United Victims’ Voices

    Leonard Family Calls for United Victims’ Voices

    Lori Leonard, daughter of John and Madeleine Leonard — whose 1970s murders in the Poconos remain unsolved — has been seriously ill in recent months, but she is undergoing treatment and hopes for a full recovery.

    Even in the face of personal hardship, Lori and her husband Randy Zona, along with Lori’s twin sister, Debbie, continue to advocate not just for their own family, but for other victims’ families as well.

    “We’ve been trying to get other victims’ families together with us,” they wrote. “The more people we make aware of victims’ lives and what we’ve all experienced — and still continue to experience — the more we can hopefully get some kind of justice for everyone.”

    The family has been distributing flyers listing multiple unsolved cases throughout the region in hopes of building awareness and pressure for renewed investigations. They are calling for unity, shared visibility, and collective pressure on law enforcement.

    If your family has been affected by an unsolved homicide or suspicious death in Northeast Pennsylvania and wants to connect with the Leonard/Zona team, please contact them at johnandmadeleineleonard@gmail.com.

    I’m wishing Lori Leonard strength and healing as she continues to advocate for justice on behalf of her mother and father and other families impacted by homicide.

    A podcast episode on the Leonard cases is currently in production for NEPA True Crime.

    This list of other cold case victims from Monroe County and the surrounding area is printed on the back of the Leonard flyers.
    This list of other cold case victims from Monroe County and the surrounding area is printed on the back of the Leonard flyers.

    See also: Dateline NBC’s Cold Case Spotlight on John and Madeleine Leonard.

  • The Girl in the Blue Slippers – The Mystery of I-80 Jane Doe

    The Girl in the Blue Slippers – The Mystery of I-80 Jane Doe

    Her remains were found in Black Creek Township, about 30 miles southwest of Wilkes-Barre, in 1973. Local lore has it her spirit haunts the stretch of highway where she was found.

    Artist’s rendering of “I-80 Jane Doe” source: https://namus.nij.ojp.gov/case/UP8924

    It’s August 9, 1973, and a tourist decides to pull off Interstate 80 near Sugarloaf in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, for a walk in the woods. But instead of enjoying a peaceful stroll, they stumble upon something horrifying — just 100 feet from the highway, wrapped in a blanket, is the body of a woman. 

    This woman, later known as I-80 Jane Doe, wasn’t just left there. The body had been doused in sulfuric acid, a highly corrosive chemical that causes third-degree burns on contact – a move clearly meant to prevent identification.

    And for more than 50 years, that’s exactly what it did.

    August 9, 1973

    Tourist finds woman’s body near I-80, Sugarloaf, PA. Wrapped in a blanket, doused with sulfuric acid

    August 15, 1973

    The remains are buried at Maple Hill Cemetery in Wilkes-Barre, PA

    November, 1973

    Three months later, the case is closed.

    2016

    I-80 Jane Doe is exhumed for DNA testing. DNA is collected but no usable profile found. Remains are reburied at Maple Hill Cemetery.

    July, 2024

    I-80 Jane Doe is exhumed a second time for advanced forensic testing

    “Body of Woman Found at Tank” Standard-Speaker, August 10, 1973, Page 15. via Newspapers.com

    Discovery and Early Investigation

    When Jane Doe was found, investigators were baffled. Luzerne County Coroner Dr. George Hudock conducted the autopsy at Wyoming Valley Hospital. Here’s what he could gather: Jane Doe was African American, between 21 and 30 years old, around 5 feet tall, and weighed about 100 pounds.

    There were no signs of injury or trauma to her body. X-rays and fingerprinting turned up nothing. Hudock ran toxicology tests to look for drugs or poison in her system, but if he found anything, it was never released to the public.

    The initial investigation revealed that the body was carried to the site, and the young woman died 48 to 72 hours before she was found.

    Checked with schools

    Luzerne County Detective James Grace told the Standard-Speaker that they were checking with schools for a missing girl, just in case she was younger than the estimate, and her description was being circulated to police departments in an eight-state area.

    But there were never any leads.

    Six days after she was found, Jane Doe was buried at Maple Hill Cemetery in Hanover Township. Rev. W.J. Atterbeary, pastor of Mt. Zion Baptist Church in Wilkes-Barre, officiated at her graveside.

    And just three months later, the investigation was closed.

    I-80 Jane Doe
    “Autopsy Fails to Determine Death Cause,” The Times Leader, August 10, 1973, Page 21. via Newspapers.com

    A Second Look: The 2016 Exhumation

    After more than four decades, investigators decided to exhume I-80 Jane Doe’s body. DNA technology had come a long way, and there was renewed hope that they could finally identify her. Dr. Erin Kimmerle from the University of South Florida led the forensic examination. They collected DNA samples, hoping for a match in national databases. 

    But despite the advancements in forensic science, it hit a dead end. No viable DNA profile could be developed. I-80 Jane Doe’s body was reburied in Maple Hill Cemetery.

    2024: A New Hope

    Now, nearly eight years later, investigators are taking another shot.

    In July 2024, Luzerne County District Attorney Samuel M. Sanguedolce and Assistant District Attorney Carl Frank filed a petition to exhume I-80 Jane Doe’s body once again. President Judge Michael T. Vough signed off on it.

    Dr. Kimmerle is back on the case, leading another forensic examination. But this time, it’s more comprehensive and will include:

    • Medicolegal autopsy
    • Skeletal analysis
    • Forensic dental analysis
    • X-rays
    • MRI scan
    • DNA extraction and sequencing

    The hope is they can get a usable profile and enter it into a national DNA database.

    That could lead to her relatives, and relatives could lead to her name. 

    Who was I-80 Jane Doe?

    Who was I-80 Jane Doe? From what we know, she was a young Black woman, probably between 20 and 30 years old (certainly younger than 40), 4’10” to 5’2” tall, and weighed around 100 pounds.

    She had dark brown or black hair tied in a short ponytail, and brown eyes. When she was found, she was wearing blue-green shorts, a pink blouse with white lace, and floral slippers. Wrapped in a yellow and green blanket, with the legs pinned. She had an upper dental bridge with six teeth.

    • African American woman, about 21-30 years old
    • Height: 4’10 to 5’2″
    • Weight: 100 lbs
    • Dark brown or black hair tied in a ponytail
    • Brown eyes
    • Wearing blue-green shorts, a pink blouse with white lace, and blue floral slippers
    • Wrapped in yellow and green blanket.
    • Wore upper dental bridge with six teeth

    The slippers/shoes found with the remains of I-80 Jane Doe. Source: The Doe Network

    What’s Next?

    With this second exhumation, officials are hopeful they’ll get enough DNA to finally identify I-80 Jane Doe. If they can match her profile to any relatives, we might finally learn her name. And once we have that, maybe the truth about what happened to her will follow.

    For now, all we can do is wait. If 2024 is the year we identify I-80 Jane Doe, it could bring closure to a case that’s haunted Pennsylvania for far too long. Some even say the ghost of I-80 Jane Doe haunts the highway where her body was found. Will this be the year her name is finally revealed and she can find some peace?

    Hopefully, time, and science, will tell us very soon.

    © 2024 NEPATrueCrime.com. All rights reserved. The text on this website is the exclusive property of NEPATrueCrime.com and its authors. Unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution of any original content is strictly prohibited. No part of this website may be copied, republished, or reproduced without explicit written permission.

    Sources:
    “Body of Woman Found at Tank,” Standard-Speaker, August 10, 1973, Page 15. via Newspapers.com 

    “Unidentified Woman to Be Buried Today,” Standard-Speaker, August 15, 1973, Page 26. via Newspapers.com 

    “Judge Grants Request to Exhume Remains Found on Highway Decades Ago,” Citizens’ Voice, August 13, 2016, Page T11. via Newspapers.com

    Unsolved: I-80 Jane Doe 1973,” The Pennsylvania Rambler, August 31, 2022

    I-80 Jane Doe’s Profile on the Jane Doe Network

    I-80 Jane Doe’s Profile on NAMUS

  • The Killer Called It In: Justice for Juanita Marie Todd

    The Killer Called It In: Justice for Juanita Marie Todd

    juanita todd
    Juanita Marie Todd. Image used with the permission of the Todd family


    HOMICIDE
    Juanita Marie Todd
    13 Academy Street
    Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania
    Luzerne County
    22 years old

    September 28, 1972

    This post is an overview of the Juanita Todd case, and the first in a series about 1970s NEPA true-crime mysteries. Future posts will go into more detail about this tragic unsolved murder.

    Case Overview

    One of the most disturbing unsolved homicides in Northeastern Pennsylvania is the 1972 murder of Juanita Marie Todd. Not only was the crime itself horrific, but there are indications the original police investigation may have been mishandled. Even worse, there’s a long-held suspicion this case was intentionally allowed to go cold.

    “Some people in this city still believe police had enough evidence to charge a suspect with the murder, but — for whatever the reason — chose not to make an arrest.”

    — Steve Corbett, “A Fading Cry for Justice,” The Times Leader, Sept 30, 1993

    In September 1972, 22-year-old Juanita Todd was the mother of two daughters, aged 18 months and 5 months. Born in Tallahassee, Juanita moved to Wilkes-Barre with her family when she was 11. She attended G.A.R. High School and later worked for Bell Telephone.

    In the weeks before her death, Juanita moved into her own apartment on Academy Street and distanced herself from her children’s father.

    Explore more unsolved Northeast Pennsylvania cold cases.

    Academy Street map
    1934 Sanbourne Fire Map showing 13 Academy Street

    A Mysterious Phone Call

    Around 3 a.m. on Thursday, September 28, Sgt. Philip Gabriel answered the phone at the Wilkes-Barre police station. According to the Times Leader, an anonymous man told him there was a homicide in the second-floor apartment at 13 Academy Street.. After sharing that alarming information, the unknown man disconnected the call.

    Two patrol cars arrived at the predawn Academy Street scene, one after the other. With assistance from the young couple who lived on the first floor, police gained entry to Juanita’s apartment from the rear of the building.

    At approximately 3:15 a.m., officers walked into a horrific scene.

    The Discovery

    In the front bedroom of her apartment, Juanita Todd lay motionless on the floor. She was resting on her side in a thick pool of blood, with multiple stab wounds to her head and body. A white piece of what appeared to be bedsheet was knotted around her neck. Contusions marred the left side of her face and scalp and other parts of her body.

    She was unclothed, but there were no obvious signs of sexual assault. The horrifying scene was made even worse by the sight of a knife embedded in her abdomen. A large floor-model fan blew a steady breeze over the young mother, whose life was cruelly cut short.

    Juanita Todd

    Babies Are Only Witnesses

    Juanita’s 18-month-old daughter, Odetta, was sitting by her mother’s head in the pool of blood. Her 5-month-old daughter, Tamu, was awake in a crib nearby.

    Newspaper reports said there were no signs of a struggle in the apartment, but blood was splattered all around the bedroom “reflecting the intensity of the assailant wielding the [sharp] instrument.”

    Juanita’s daughters were taken to Wilkes-Barre General Hospital for examination, and in a miracle amidst tragedy, they were found to be healthy and physically unharmed.

    Black-and-white photo of the two-story house at 13 Academy Street printed in the newspaper
    “Home Where Murder Victim Lived,” The Times Leader (Sept. 28, 1972) Wilkes-Barre, PA.

    Time of Death

    Luzerne County Deputy Coroner Walter W. Lisman pronounced Juanita Marie Todd dead at the scene at 4:30 a.m. He reported that at 8:30 a.m., more than five hours after Juanita was found, the temperature outdoors was 50 F.

    Juanita was last seen on Tuesday night, September 26. The pathologist estimated that she died at least 15 hours before her 3:15 a.m. discovery on the 28th. Based on that timeline, her death would have occurred on or before noon, Wednesday, September 27. This suggests that both infants remained with their mother’s lifeless body for over 15 hours.

    A news article from January 1973 expanded the potential timeframe, indicating Juanita could have passed between 15 to 24 hours before her discovery at 3:15 a.m. It’s unknown what that estimation was based on.

    Read more unsolved local homicides from the 1970s.

    Questions about the time of death

    Death investigation experts say it’s impossible to pinpoint an exact time of death without an attending physician on the scene when the death occurs.

    However, an unofficial source close to the case suggests that Juanita was likely murdered six to eight hours before she was discovered at 3 a.m.

    They base this estimate on techniques that consider factors such as body temperature and the onset of rigor mortis. This could mean Juanita was killed between 7 p.m. and 9 p.m. on Wednesday, rather than before 12 p.m. that day, marking a considerable shift in the timeline.

    Also, some suspect the fan blowing on her body was placed there to try to throw off the time-of-death estimate.

    Autopsy Report


    The autopsy was performed at the Wyoming Valley Hospital morgue by Dr. William Kashatus, who determined the primary cause of death was a fatal stab wound to the heart. Penetrating punctures around the right side of the chest also contributed to her demise.

    In addition to “22 puncture wounds of the head and all over the body,” there were two superficial lacerations: one on her hand, and another marking her face. The hyoid bone, located in the middle front of the neck, was broken — an indication of manual strangulation.

    “My mom was tortured and tormented to death.”

    — Odetta Todd, as told to Steve Corbett, “Who Killed Juanita Todd, Part 1,” www.theoutloawcorbett.com

    Motives and Suspects

    “Robbery, jealousy, and vengeance are the three motives responsible for nearly all murders.”

    Dr. George Burgeas Magrath, professor of Legal Medicine, medical examiner of Suffolk County,NY. 

    Juanita’s daughter Odetta shared with journalist Steve Corbett that only three days before her murder, Juanita had arranged a meeting with Magistrate Michael Collins to secure a restraining order against three particular ex-friends. Why she was asking for that restraining order is not known to this writer.

    A 1978 news article stated that the murder was possibly drug-related. Or perhaps it was something personal, maybe involving Juanita’s common-law husband. Robbery does not appear to have been a motive. Some of the possible suspects:

    1. The babies’ father: The man listed on the girls’ birth certificates, who was not involved in raising them, took a lie detector test and passed. Based on that and his interviews with police, he was ruled out as a suspect.
    2. The Bodyguard: A male friend of Juanita’s, who described himself as her bodyguard, left town the night before he was due to take a police lie detector test. He has long been considered the primary suspect, but information that came to light later casts doubt on his guilt.
    3. A member or members of a local drug ring: It is rumored that Juanita, who didn’t want drugs in her home, found a valuable quantity of drugs and flushed them. Perhaps her murder was retribution for that.
    4. A stranger: Police have surmised that Juanita’s killer could have been one of many people from out of town who were in Wilkes-Barre to help with the Agnes flood cleanup.

    The police may have other suspects and persons of interest that we just don’t know about.

    “We…have not been able to forget the case of the Todd girl who hated drugs and was about to blow the whistle on some limelight person when she was murdered mysteriously, with the murderers being paid off to leave town and never being brought to justice. [T]he Todd girl held life too dear to have hers snuffed out.” — A Black Resident

    From an anonymous Letter to the Editor (Citizen’s Voice, Nov 11, 1978). While the suggestions that Juanita was about to “blow the whistle” and “murderers[were] paid off” are considered rumors, this Letter to the Editor shows what people thought about this case, particularly members of Wilkes-Barre’s Black community.

    Initial Investigation

    The newspaper stated that police were investigating this murder around the clock. This is a summary of the information shared with the media following the murder:

    No one reported seeing an individual entering or leaving Juanita’s apartment at the time of the murder. The downstairs neighbors said they hadn’t heard anything amiss from upstairs.

    The officer first on the scene, Thomas Bird, told journalist Steve Corbett it appeared someone had washed Juanita’s face after her death. He also said it appeared the babies had been fed and diapers changed.a

    Det. Bird also told Corbett he found an open loaf of bread on the counter. He said he reached in to touch the bread, and it was still soft and fresh, even though the woman had been dead for at least 15 hours. (Times Leader, Oct. 10, 1993)

    It seems the murderer either stayed on the scene for a long time after or possibly left and returned to check on the children later.

    Police told the family that a hair was found at the scene that didn’t belong to Juanita. (Times Leader, April 30, 2000)

    The anonymous call to police was said to have been traced to a phone booth at the nearby Penn Plaza Shopping Center. That was announced three days after the crime.

    Then-Captain of Detectives John Lowe, photo taken during a probe into possible police mishandling of the Juanita Todd case and others, 1979

    One year later

    1973: A Times Leader article published one year after the murder reported that the case was being investigated mainly by Detective Captain John W. Lowe, Detective Bernard Banas, and Detective John Bilecki.

    Det. Capt. Lowe told the TL that Wilkes-Barre police were working closely with the State Police Crime Laboratory at the Wyoming Barracks, adding that Trooper William Koscinski was assigned to the case.

    Lowe stated that over the year following the murder, four people, including one woman, voluntarily took lie detector tests administered by a Montoursville State Police specialist, and they passed (TL, Jan. 7, 1973). One person refused the test. Nearly 80 people were interviewed.

    When asked if he had a suspect or suspects, Lowe answered, “Yes,” but refused to say more.

    1974: After a brief mention in the Times Leader in 1974, local news outlets pretty much fell silent about the Juanita Todd case.

    That is, until 1978, when a probe was launched into the Wilkes-Barre City Police Department (more about that to come in future posts).

    In 2002, Odetta Todd, Juanita’s daughter, was conducting her own investigation into her mother’s murder. She spoke with former Capt. of Detectives John Lowe, who told her a tire iron was found in the sink at Juanita’s apartment. He also said three sets of fingerprints were identified, contrary to news reports that the place had been wiped clean.

    What About DNA?

    The great news is we’ve heard Wilkes-Barre police are currently reinvestigating this case. As far as is known, this case was last formally looked at in 1994. The hope is that W-B police will revisit all the evidence and send it out for modern DNA testing. They have not disclosed what evidence they have in their possession, citing the confidentiality required in an ongoing murder investigation, but they could have the following:

    • The knife
    • The piece of bedsheet that was tied around the victim’s neck
    • The tire iron found in the sink
    • The foreign hair
    • Fibers removed from beneath the victim’s fingernails
    • A blood-splattered coin found in the home of a possible witness

      They should also have fingerprint evidence, interview notes, and polygraph results.

    Information Needed

    • If you have any information you think might help solve this case, please contact the Wilkes-Barre Police Department at (570) 208-4200.
    • You can also send anonymous tips through PA Crime Stoppers (online) or by calling the PA Crime Stoppers Hotline at 1-800-4PA-TIPS. You’ll receive a $5,000 reward if your tip leads to an arrest.

    The Juanita Todd Case in the News

    Print/Web:

    Sources:

    •”Break Seen in Death of Juanita Todd,” The Times Leader, October 1, 1972
    • “City Woman, 22, Found Murdered,” The Times Leader, Sept. 28, 1972
    • Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from Wilkes Barre, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. Sanborn Map Company, Vol. 2, 1934
    • “Wilkes-Barre Police Still Investigate Year-Old Murder,” The Times Leader, September 23, 1973
    • Steve Corbett, “A Fading Cry for Justice,” The Times Leader, 30 Sept. 1993.
    • Steve Corbett, “A Search That Must Not End,” The Times Leader, 10 Oct. 1993.
    • Steve Corbett, “Somebody, Do Something, ” The Times Leader, 06 Feb 1994.
    • Steve Corbett, “New Evidence in Case Worth a Look,” The Times Leader, 30 Apr 2000.
    TheOutlawCorbett.com/news
    Juanita Todd: Dateline Cold Case Spotlight by Nicolás Viñuela.